#Hyper 212 evo pro#

The noise level of each cooler was measured between 1:00 and 3:00 AM in a closed room about 20 m2 big using CENTER-321 electronic noise meter. The room temperature during our test session varied between 24.5-24.7☌. The ambient temperature was checked next to the system case with an electronic thermometer with 0.1 ☌ precision that allows hourly monitoring of the temperature changes over the past 6 hours. Moreover, we will also provide a table with the temperature readings for all cores including their average values. We took the maximum temperature of the hottest CPU core for the results charts. The stabilization period for the CPU temperature between the two test cycles was about 8-10 minutes. The CPU was loaded with two consecutive CST test runs with the settings as indicated above. The nominal processor Vcore was increased to 1.3875 V in the mainboard BIOS: We overclocked our six-core processor (with its default non-lapped heat-spreader) with the multiplier set at 25x and “Load-Line Calibration” (Level 2) enabled to 4.3 GHz. Power supply: Xigmatek “No Rules Power” NRP-HC1501 1500 W (with a default 140 mm fan).Control and monitoring panel: Zalman ZM-MFC2.

#Hyper 212 evo pro#

System case: Antec Twelve Hundred (front panel: three Noiseblocker NB-Multiframe S-Series MF12-S2 fans at 1020 RPM back panel: two Noiseblocker NB-BlackSilent PRO PL-1 fans at 1020 RPM top panel: standard 200 mm fan at 400 RPM).Backup drive: Samsung Ecogreen F4 HD204UI (SATA-II, 2 TB, 5400 RPM, 32 MB, NCQ).Drive for programs and games: Western Digital VelociRaptor (300GB, SATA-II, 10000 RPM, 16MB cache, NCQ) inside Scythe Quiet Drive 3.5” HDD silencer and cooler.System drive: RAID-0 of 2 x Kingston V-series SNV425S2128GB SSD (SATA-II, 128 GB, MLC, Toshiba TC58NCF618G3T controller).Memory: DDR3 3 x 2 GB OCZ Platinum Low-Voltage Triple Channel (Spec: 1600MHz / 7-7-7-24 / 1.65 V).Graphics card: Asus Radeon HD 6770 DirectCU Silent (EAH6770 DCSL/2DI/1GD5) GDDR5 128 bit, 850/4000 MHz (with a passive heatsink from the DeepCool V4000 VGA cooler).

Processor: Intel Core i7-980X Extreme Edition, 3.33 GHz, 1.225 V, 6 x 256 KB L2, 12 MB 元 (Gulftown, B1).

Mainboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-OC (Intel X58 Express, LGA 1366, BIOS F5c from ).

It demonstrates the EVO’s versatility and makes it the perfect entry level cooler for enthusiasts and budget-conscious builders alike.We performed all cooler tests inside a closed system case. The EVO also holds several other key advantages such as its lower price, quieter fan, more compact size and support for 140mm fans with 120mm mounting holes. The Enermax ETS-T40 is the Cooler Master’s closest competition at this end of the spectrum and although the latter delivered better performance at stock speed, it failed to keep up with the EVO at 4GHz. The difference in performance is admittedly marginal but we have to remember that for the given price, it represents even better value for money than the outgoing Hyper 212+. This was further highlighted when we switched the stock fan to the Noctua and Coolink fans in order to do a proper apple-to-apple comparison and observed better efficiency with the EVO. The other difference is the lower RPM fan on the EVO but remarkably, performance was never inferior to the 2000RPM fan bundled with the Hyper 212+ thereby highlighting the EVO’s better cooling efficiency. I say changes in plural but the truth is that the only noticeable difference is the Continuous Direct Contact technology whereby all the heat pipes are in contact with each other. Instead the changes were far more subtle. On initial impressions, there didn’t appear to be much difference between the EVO and its predecessor and the reality is that there wasn’t. Cooler Master have to be created for not only surpassing their own highly successful Hyper 212+ in performance but also in acoustics.